There isn’t a superb Jordan-stats comp in higher education basketball this year. Strictly from an offensive-numbers standpoint, 1 could think about Ole Miss’ Marshall Henderson, whose a hundred and fifteen.three ORating, 26.3% utilization and fifty seven.2% real taking pictures are very a lot from the junior-year Jordan range. But it isn’t going to appear wise to look at a man who usually takes 10-plus treys a game with someone who didn’t even hold the alternative. Amongst actual NBA draft potential customers, UCLA freshman Shabazz Muhammad’s offense may be the closest; http://www.topjordanheels100.comhis 108.9 ORating, 28.5% utilization and 55.0% real taking pictures are during the standard area, and he provides a a lot even bigger position in UCLA’s assault than Jordan did to be a frosh at Carolina. Jordan had to share the floor with James Worthy that year, though, when the next-closest NBA prospect on Muhammad’s roster is really a glue man, forward Kyle Anderson.
You can find also one guard who often tends to make gravity-defying performs all-around the rim that seem just like a college or university Jordan: Indiana junior Victor Oladipo. He’s not a terrific statistical comp, though, for the reason that his offense is of a various mother nature — he is high-efficiency (128.nine ORating) but lower-usage (22.3% of possessions) — and his protection is, properly … choose a look with the figures:
Oladipo will get eight.4 rebounds per forty minutes,http://www.topjordanheels100.com at the same time as three.3 steals, 1.1 blocks in addition to a incredibly higher variety of deflections, and he is the frontrunner for large 10 defensive player on the calendar year. He’ll be drafted not for the reason that any person thinks he is the next Jordan — no person will at any time be — but as the stats say he D’d up harder than Jordan did in college or university. I think that is definitely a compliment Oladipo would willingly take.